Property Tax Rate History


In early May, 2017, at a cost of approximatelyy $8,000, the council sent out a glossy color document intended, in my opinion, to lay the public relations groundwork for the upcoming policy decision to level fund the school department.

The mailer contained the graphic below, which claimed that the median tax bill was $6,962 in 2011 and in 2016 it was $10,516, an attention-grabbing 51% increase.

It also claimed that the part of the town budget funded by taxes had increased 15.4%. Essentially, this says that the total taxes collected (the levy) only grew by 15.4%, which seemed inconsistent with the 51% increase in the median tax bill.

Mailer

Reading further, the following statement appeared:

Mailer

It seemed very unlikely that the median and the average (mean) tax bills would match to the dollar.

I checked our tax bills, and they had not increased by anywhere near 51%, so I began to suspect the numbers in the mailer were wrong.

At the first Town Council meeting in June, I said during public comment that the numbers in the mailer were wrong. I was politely told they were not, and it was suggested that I could set up a meeting with the finance director and she would explain the numbers.

At this time, the position of finance director was in transition, and Councilman Schwager suggested I meet with the tax assessor instead. This made sense because the median tax bill graphic referenced the following footnote:

Mailer


Subsequently I met with the tax assessor, and it was immediately clear that she had no idea where the numbers in the mailer had come from. She gave me copies of what she had provided to the finance director and town manager, starting with the following email to the IT director at New England Revaluation, the contractor who hosts the town's real estate database:

Mailer

It was interesting that she had apparently been asked for this on short notice, in the week before the mailer was sent out. The response was:

Mailer
At this point I was convinced that the numbers in the mailer were wrong.

I put together this YouTube video, which explains why the 51% number is wrong and calculates an estimate using the valuations the tax assessor had given me:

Mailer
The computations outlined in the video produced an estimate of 15.5% for the percentage increase in the average tax bill (there was no way to compute the median increase with the information I had). I knew this was based on numbers that were not quite the right ones to use, but hopefully they were not that much different from the correct ones, which would have been based on the valuations on 12/31/2009 and 12/31/2014.